Apple 21.5in iMac (mid-2014)

James Galbraith
25 June, 2014
View more articles fromthe author
AAA

Apple 21.5in iMac (mid-2014)

Apple, apple.com/au

Pros 

Lower price; integrated IPS LED screen; eye-catching design

Cons 

Non-upgradable RAM; slow, limited-capacity 5400RPM drive; only iMac without four processing cores

$1349

Reviews

How does the new iMac rate against the rest of the range? Price is the key

Working in the Macworld Lab as I do, I tend to focus on system performance when recommending (or not recommending) computers for purchase. The truth is, however, that many people buy computers based largely on price.

After all, it doesn’t take the horsepower of a high-end Mac to surf the internet, run office applications, send email, or take care of other everyday computer chores. Some buyers simply don’t want (or need) to invest in the latest PCIe-connnected flash storage, quad-core i7 processors, and discrete GPUs capable of supporting 4K video. Apple has these budget-minded buyers in mind with its latest, lower-priced iMac.

Until recently, the standard iMac lineup included two 27in models and two 21.5in models. With this latest release, a third 21.5in iMac joins the team. Priced at just $1349 – $250 less than the previous low-end iMac – this new system is externally identical to the the rest of the 21.5in iMacs, as well as those released in October of 2012. It has the same 5mm thin-edged design, the same glossy 1920-by-1080 IPS screen, the same four USB 3.0 ports, gigabit Ethernet, two Thunderbolt ports, headphone jack and SDXC card slots.

The tradeoff for those super-thin edges is that there is no room on the side for peripheral ports, much less an optical drive. I would personally prefer to have the convenience of front or side peripheral ports than I would that razor-thin edge – especially because this is a desktop machine.

Under the hood, the price-versus-power choices become apparent. In fact, the new low-end iMac’s internal specifications have more in common with the latest MacBook Airs than with the rest of the iMac family. Where the $1599 iMac has a quad-core 2.7GHz Core i5 processor, the $1349 iMac has a dual-core 1.4GHz Core i5 processor. The $1599 model has a 1TB, 5400 RPM hard drive, while the $1349 iMac has a 500GB hard drive of the same rotational speed. The $1599 iMac also has faster Intel Iris Pro integrated graphics than the new low-end’s Intel HD Graphics 5000.

Configuration options are also really limited on the new low-end system. There is no incremental processor upgrade, no graphics upgrade and no RAM upgrades available. The other iMacs in the line can be upgraded to 16GB at the time of purchase. DIYers hoping to save a few bucks by going through the hassle of installing their own RAM are out of luck with the new $1349 iMac: Apple is using LPDDR3 RAM that is soldered to the motherboard. The RAM on the other 21.5in models might be hard to access, but it’s doable if you’re tenacious, and if you do you’ll find two standard DDR3 DIMM slots. You can upgrade from the standard 500GB hard drive to 1TB drive for an extra $60; an extra $300 will get you either 256GB of flash storage or a 1TB Fusion drive, which combines a 1TB hard drive with 128GB of flash storage.

As you can read in our full benchmark report, there is now a wide performance gap between the low-end iMac and the next step up the product line. The new $1349 iMac was slower across the board, and 54 percent slower overall, than the $1599 21.5in system. One thing to note: We weren’t crazy about the $1599 model when it shipped. It offered just modest speed improvements over the October 2012 system and most of that was due to the $1599 iMac’s use of Iris Pro graphics – which are not included in the new $1349 system. We tested the new entry-level iMac with the optional Fusion Drive installed and found its superior storage performance helped the custom iMac post a 23 percent higher Speedmark score than the stock system.

Bottom line

The price of buying an iMac just went down. The big question: Is a 15 percent lower price worth 50 percent lower performance? For people who buy Macs for their ease of use, stylish design and seamless integration with iOS devices, this less expensive model offers all of that; it will also run most modern applications just fine. If you can swing it, however, the $1599 has double the processing cores running at nearly double the clock speed and twice the storage capacity of this new low-end iMac.

2 Comments

2 people were compelled to have their say. We encourage you to do the same..

  1. Dean Wiles says:

    James, You are hanging on to a dream, I’m looking at a 2006 iMac that I still use as a supplementary machine and that doesn’t have side ports while being quite thick. I guess $250 isn’t a lot more for the better model, but you are correct in saying a lot of people only want a basic computer and lets face it, it will be a lot easier for them to use. Dean

  2. Keith Heale says:

    I think the review is spot on, including the comment about thinness overruling practicality. Dean is right though; I have an old PowerPC iMac whose case has sides 48mm deep. Even then, desigh aesthetics were more important to Apple than user convenience – the miserable selection of ports were all relegated to the back panel where they are hard to reach, and even harder to distinguish from one another.

    The trend towards making iMacs les and less upgradeable is really regrettable. Sure, they are relatively cheap, but not being able easily to slip in an extra memory module or a bigger hard disk is making people like me think about going back to Windows for my next home computer. Much of the “it just works” advantage of Macs has disappeared as the talent at Apple has been diverted to the iOS products, and many of the core aspects of OSX have not been substantially improved for years (eg the crappy Finder).

Leave a Comment

Please keep your comments friendly on the topic.

Contact us