How Apple can make music sound sweeter

Dan Moren
13 February, 2017
View more articles fromthe author
AAA
News

We’ve heard the refrain over and over again: music is in Apple’s DNA. It’s been uttered regularly by Tim Cook, and even if Steve Jobs didn’t put it in exactly those words, it was clear from the direction in which he steered Apple – introducing products like the iTunes and the iPod – how important music was to both him and the corporation he headed.

But even as the company continues to push its Apple Music venture, there are a few places where Apple would be better served by re-examining the way it approaches music. From services to software to hardware, Apple’s become pretty comfortable about where it stands with music – but not necessarily because it has the best solutions out there.

Fix iTunes and Music

A year and a half ago, I made the argument that Apple should break up iTunes, preferably with at least the same level of vigour with which the US Government approached Ma Bell. The desktop software has become a morass of half-forgotten features that have accumulated over its long lifespan.

In part, I understand why Apple hasn’t yet targeted the app for revamping. For one, I have to imagine that fewer people listen to iTunes on their Macs these days. Most folks are probably more plugged into their smartphones while on the go, and when you’re at home you may have a Bluetooth speaker, a stereo system or wireless options like Sonos. Additionally, none of the Macs that Apple currently sells comes with speakers worth writing home about, and I couldn’t even find traditional computer speakers in Apple’s online store – everything there is wireless. And, of course, the free and integral nature of iTunes has effectively killed any serious competition on the Mac; there’s little incentive for Apple to improve iTunes when it’s the only game in town.

apple music 2017 browse

iTunes is starting to look more like the Music app on iOS, but they could still both use an overhaul.

And though it’s received more attention, the Music app on iOS is no great shakes either. It’s riddled with confusing interface decisions (having to scroll down for the Up Next queue and shuffle/repeat buttons), sometimes frustrating integration with Apple Music (especially if you don’t want to use Apple Music), and the removal of other features (no more Genius Playlists?), among other flaws. At least, unlike iTunes on the Mac, there’s a little more room for competition, though mostly from streaming services.

 

So maybe it’s time to go back to the drawing board for both of these. Just as Apple created a Photos app on the Mac and iOS that (mostly) brought parity to both platforms, launching an effort to create a Music app on both Mac and iOS, with similar features and UI (user interface), could put those offerings back at the top of their game.

Improve AirPlay

AirTunes was impressive when it launched back in 2004, but its rebranding as AirPlay in 2010 expanded its usefulness by integrating with iOS and the Apple TV. In the intervening years, it’s lost a bit of its cachet, thanks to competing technologies like Google’s Cast and Sonos’ wireless music system.

It also never quite took off in the peripheral market, thanks to often buggy implementation and high prices. Some may argue the respective sound quality of Bluetooth speakers versus AirPlay speakers, but the truth is that Bluetooth speakers are cheaper and – in my experience – more reliable. If you’re willing to pay a little more, you can find one with very good sound, and you could always step up to a Sonos system.

So perhaps it’s time for an AirPlay revolution. At the very least, Apple should focus on giving AirPlay bulletproof reliability. AirPlay is a cool technology, but it’s languished, as streaming music from the internet, rather than a local library, has become more popular. Then again, maybe Apple should consider getting into the hardware market itself.

Make a speaker

Apple has made a few forays into the speaker market over the years: it sold computer speakers for Macs, occasionally teaming up with Harman Kardon, and of course made the much maligned iPod Hi-Fi more than a decade ago. But recently it’s stuck with headphones, from the iPod earbuds to AirPods, and now the entire Beats brand as well.

apple pro speakers primary

Apple Pro speakers by Harman Kardon

Beats does sell a single Bluetooth speaker, but it may behoove Apple to make a larger push in wireless speakers instead of just licensing AirPlay to other manufacturers – especially if that speaker would work out of the box with Apple Music. Granted, perhaps it would be more effective to just snap up Sonos – especially if Apple could find a way to integrate Siri.

Then again, Apple doesn’t have to do any of this; it can simply keep on trucking the way it’s been. But for a company that claims music is a part of its genetic make-up, it’s been awfully focused on only a very small piece of the overall picture.

One Comment

One person was compelled to have their say. We encourage you to do the same..

  1. Cube Over says:

    iTunes Hi-Rez will do. (192Khz * 32b) otherwise the current price per track does not make sense. And iPhone 8 should be able to play this without downsampling.

Leave a Comment

Please keep your comments friendly on the topic.

Contact us