Macworld Australia

Macworld Forums: Apple Lossless - Really Lossless? - Macworld Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Apple Lossless - Really Lossless?

#1 User is offline   subs team 

  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 43
  • Joined: 25-June 08
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Niche

Posted 21 August 2009 - 04:42 PM

Is it really lossless? To me apple lossless files sound worse than a 320 VBR mp3. FLAC files sound true to the original. Am I wrong? What are your thoughts?

Thanks

Robbie
0

#2 Guest_coaten_*

  • Group: Guests

Posted 21 August 2009 - 07:46 PM

An interesting question, Robbie, and seeing how I know you have well-trained ears, I wouldn't doubt your opinion. I did make an Apple Lossless, a 320kbps MP3 and an AIFF version of a reference track to hear for myself over my Koss cans.

I didn't find either of the compressed versions objectionable. The Lossless, however, sounded like it had the "Hall" setting from my Home Theatre system. A bit more reverb than the AIFF, though I don't understand why that would be the case, and as a consequence the mid-tones lost some definition. But overall, not much better or worse. I wouldn't choose Lossless as a preference. Never have. And I don't think I'm alone. Apple, perhaps, should stick to selling music, not compressing it,eh?
0

#3 User is offline   mickdevlin 

  • Power guru
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 7,910
  • Joined: 28-January 08
  • Gender:Not Telling

Posted 21 August 2009 - 08:27 PM

I no longer bother with compressed settings when I rip a CD, I just use AIFF. RAM and HDDs are cheap and large these days.
Mick
0

#4 User is offline   subs team 

  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 43
  • Joined: 25-June 08
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Niche

Posted 25 August 2009 - 04:29 PM

Interesting, it kinda annoys me that apple would use a term like 'lossless' it sure implies like it would be the same as a AIFF. I wish iTunes would support FLAC a truly lossless but still smaller files.
0

#5 User is offline   Molecule 

  • Mentor
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 397
  • Joined: 04-July 09
  • Gender:Male

Posted 30 August 2009 - 11:52 PM

I haven't heard Apple Lossless so I don't know, but I what I do know is that FLAC sounds phenomenal - The only reason I don't use it much is because iTunes doesn't support it (loading up every file individually in VLC can be somewhat tedious).

If only Apple would get behind Free formats...
Molecule

“Light thinks it travels faster than anything but it is wrong. No matter how fast light travels, it finds the darkness has always got there first, and is waiting for it.” - Terry Pratchett
0

#6 User is offline   4bears 

  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 39
  • Joined: 22-February 08

Posted 11 September 2009 - 12:11 AM

I have a couple of iTunes Librarys. One is just of my own CDs ripped as ALAC 'Apple Lossless'. And other as either MP3 or AAC. To me, ALAC is superior in sound when compared to MP3/ AAC. If you have high quality equipment, you will hear the difference. I wish iTunes would sell music in lossless form, then I would pay for it. To me, why pay for something that just aint all there? ie AAC 256kb lossy.
0

Share this topic:


Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users