Time Capsule
#1
Posted 11 October 2010 - 02:10 PM
I am thinking of getting more external storage as my current lame 120GB hard drive and my 500GB external Western Digital Hard Drive are getting full.
I was thinking of getting the Time Capsule, as I like the idea of everything wireless, and also it can act as a router, but I read some reviews on Apples website and people have said that the drive seems to have a short lifespan and just dies, usually after 18 months. Has anyone had experience with the Time capsule and have had similar issues?
I've looked for other external drives that might be wireless but none seem to exist?
The other thing is that the Time Capsule is very expensive compared to just getting another Western Digital external hard drive, which I might end up getting. It's just nice to have no wires.
I've also looked into backing up in the cloud, but that would use so much data allowance and take ages to backup as well, and also probably end up costing more in the long run.
So what are people's thoughts on the Time Capsule?
What do you all do to back up your data?
#2
Posted 11 October 2010 - 04:08 PM
TL
Ken
#3
Posted 11 October 2010 - 04:59 PM
An added bonus is the fact that it's a 802.11n base station. Buying it meant that I could use it as my primary Wi-Fi router and use the old Airport Extreme to extend the coverage to the other end of the mansion.
Cheers
Dave
PS: Printer sharing is cool, too.
#4
Posted 11 October 2010 - 05:49 PM
#5
Posted 11 October 2010 - 07:39 PM
If you read the reviews on the Apple Website under the Time Capsule product, so many people have said that it has died on them.
Anyway, thanks for the replies.
#6
Posted 12 October 2010 - 04:40 AM
jz
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
"It's more fun to be a pirate than to join the navy" - Steve Jobs
#7
Posted 12 October 2010 - 12:23 PM
#8
Posted 12 October 2010 - 01:29 PM
Looks like I'll just be going for a standard external hard drive.. Sob sob...
#10
Posted 12 October 2010 - 04:34 PM
"It's more fun to be a pirate than to join the navy" - Steve Jobs
#11
Posted 12 October 2010 - 05:33 PM
#13
Posted 12 October 2010 - 08:11 PM
#14
Posted 12 October 2010 - 08:30 PM
Read Test:
5000 files (300 MB total) FireWire was 33% faster than USB 2.0
160 files (650MB total) FireWire was 70% faster than USB 2.0
Write Test:
5000 files (300 MB total) FireWire was 16% faster than USB 2.0
160 files (650MB total) FireWire was 48% faster than USB 2.0
Hope it helps
Tl
Ken
#15
Posted 12 October 2010 - 08:57 PM
Results:
USB 2.0 - 7mins 28 secs
Firewire 400 - 8 mins 47 secs
So looks like USB 2.0 is faster than Firewire 400. I wish I could test Firewire 800.
Is there a Firewire 400 to 800 converter available that would work I wonder?
#16
Posted 13 October 2010 - 08:49 AM
As an example of what you can get, Verbatim are releasing a new range of USB 3.0 Superspeed Portable Hard Drives this month, in 500GB ($129) and 1TB ($219) capacities.
OK, you won't have a Mac that can handle USB 3.0 yet, but in the meantime you're still getting USB 2.0 speeds AND you're future-proofed!
Cheers
Dave
#17
Posted 13 October 2010 - 09:06 AM
#18
Posted 13 October 2010 - 09:33 AM
Dave Bullard, on 13 October 2010 - 08:49 AM, said:
As an example of what you can get, Verbatim are releasing a new range of USB 3.0 Superspeed Portable Hard Drives this month, in 500GB ($129) and 1TB ($219) capacities.
OK, you won't have a Mac that can handle USB 3.0 yet, but in the meantime you're still getting USB 2.0 speeds AND you're future-proofed!
Cheers
Dave
What are the benefits of buying a portable drive over a desktop external drive besides the obvious of not having to plug it in to a power point?
Are there any disadvantages over buying an external portable hard drive opposed to a desktop one that you have to plug in?
#19
Posted 13 October 2010 - 07:32 PM
Tl
Ken
#20
Posted 13 October 2010 - 11:59 PM
http://dylstra.wordpress.com
http://twitter.com/Dylstra
http://dylstra.tent.is
Help

















