News, Reviews and more from Australia's Macintosh Authority
ADVERTISEMENT
Straight out of the starting gate I am enthralled at the current activity in camera companies as they decide what to do about the internal tussles between compact cameras and dSLRs. Some fixed lens compacts — from the same company — seem to be fighting with dSLRs in terms of features. Take a look at Olympus’s 20x digicam versus Nikon’s 18x job. They both make dSLRs too!
And what about the flood of low cost, multi function printers that can print, fax, scan, make the tea and empty the bins? What is the world coming to?
Switzerland.
Last year 822,000 compacts were sold, despite rising sales of dSLRs. There’s been a trend towards high res compacts: 48 percent of cameras sold have a 7-8 megapixel resolution. Sales of high-performance 8-9 megapixel cameras also increased significantly.
Sales of dSLRs rose by almost 40 percent in comparison to 2006. It’s expected that the digital SLR trend will continue in 2008, at the expense of compact cameras.
Amateurs go! I’ve often thought that some amateurs could well match talent with some professional photographers. Note: I said "some" amateurs. In Sony’s World Photography Awards eight part-time photographers, armed with just their digital cameras, came in tops. One lad, a doctor from West Bengal, took the grand first place prize of amateur photographer of the year, for a shot of a local barber shaving a customer. The shot beat 26,000 other entries and picked up a prize of $US5000.
Figures down. Do you get the feeling that the general population is printered-out? Last year fewer American households bought a photo-quality printer than in 2006. It was reported that less than ten percent of all households and around 12 percent of digital camera owners bought one in 2007, compared to 12 percent of all households and 18 percent of digital camera owners in 2006.
The interesting thing is there is a trend towards large-format photo printers. Market share on these climbed in 2007, from 71 to 79 percent of all photo printers purchased. And … dSLR owners are roughly twice as likely as the average consumer to purchase a photo printer.
"Where are they now". Polaroid — yes, Polaroid — has announced a new, low cost digital camera: the i535.
The new camera is aimed at introducing people to digital photography. It has a five-megapixel CMOS sensor, 3x optical zoom and a 6cm LCD screen. It has 32MB of internal memory, plus an SD/SDHC card slot. Video can be shot at 640x480 pixels in Motion JPEG format. The kit includes a carry case and a flexible mini tripod. Nice idea!
ISO settings are limited to 50, 100 or 200. The macro mode allows shooting objects about 5cm away. Price a little over $US100, and we'll tell you Australian pricing if and when we get it.
wrote on May 13, 2008 11:55 AM
Why does any camera (pro or otherwise) need to be anything more than a the best lens you can afford, with with a few buttons on the back? Are people really fed up with cheap printers with ink cartridges that only last 10 pages (a neighbour of mine has one of these) and cost more than the printer to replace? Possibly not. HP introduces the $69 Laser Jet, with no listed price for the consumables (unsurprisingly). And does the Polaroid camera come with a AAA battery powered 100mm X 100mm printer? We watch this space in anticipation...
I’ve done a fair bit of macro photography —- both in stills and video—- and, while the current crop of digital cameras promise amazing specs in the closeup department, most them fall down quite badly when the practical aspects are taken into account. For instance, the Ricoh Caplio GX100 is quite a nice camera and seems to promise the world inmacro shooting.
Barrie Smith | Jan 21, 2008
What we really need in a photo printer is not what any vendor is offering right now. Almost every vendor offers a postcard-only photo printer, for three times the money they’re asking for an all-in-one A4-sized scanner/copier/printer/coffee-maker. Those postcard-sized photo printers are just plain wrong for several reasons.
Ian Yates | Jan 28, 2008
New owners of mobile phones revel in their clever and multiple abilities. It's not just a phone, it's also a GPS, and a web browser, and a music player, and ... sigh ... a camera. The big plus to taking shots with a phone camera is the "sneak factor". Very quietly, very slyly, you can take shots with your phone’s camera a lot more inconspicuously than using a digicam. Which brings in many issues relating to privacy and security and explains why some locations ban the use of mobile phones outright.
Barrie Smith | Feb 18, 2008
From cruising the various blogs it’s obvious that users are getting very savvy about the techy details of digicams. Quite often the comments posted indicate a surprising depth of knowledge on the consumers' part. However, there also appears to be a surprising wad of knowledge about subtler aspects: one of these is the quality of light for superior picture taking. And that means "sans flash". Get the most of the natural light that surrounds you. If you’re shooting a portrait or a group make sure there’s light on your subject: not speckled light that has filtered through tree leaves, not a direct full on blast from the sun — but something in between. Light from the side is ideal as it outlines the subject and allows any front light to be softer and more flattering to the human face.
Barrie Smith | Mar 18, 2008