News, Reviews and more from Australia's Macintosh Authority
ADVERTISEMENT
I’ve often said, quite unashamedly, that Apple’s oft-discussed market share was not an accurate representation of its position in the market. The figures are skewed, I contend, by the inclusion of markets in which Apple does not compete. A recent analysis by market-research firm NPD bears this out.
According to NPD, Apple’s overall share of PC sales at traditional bricks-and-mortar retailers during the first quarter of this year languished at about 14 percent. However, if you exclude computers costing under $US1000, Apple’s share rises to a staggering 66 percent. Two-thirds of all computers sold at traditional retailers to customers with over a grand to spend are Macs.
These are iPod numbers.
And lest you accuse me (or indeed NPD) of being selective in our use of figures, consider this: almost every Mac costs over $US1000. Sure, you can get most Mac minis for less than that depending on configuration, but clearly Apple has decided it doesn’t want to have too much of a play in the sub-$US1000 market. And that strategy is paying off.
Handsomely.
You may also be thinking that that 14 percent figure seems unexpectedly high. Well, it is. That’s because NPD was only looking at retail sales, so it wasn’t including sales through VARs and systems integrators — the kinds of dealers who sell to corporate customers who buy 5000 computers at a time. My contention has long been that Apple’s much-touted two percent and similar market-share figures rather unfairly include such sales.
Until Apple makes a serious play for the corporate market, I don’t think it should be graded down for not selling many Macs to corporate customers. Quite simply, 5000 employees of a company that supplies them with standard beige Windows boxes have not made a choice about what computer they’re going to use.
When you look at people who actually make a decision about what computer they’re going to buy, as NPD has done, Apple’s figures rise dramatically.
One caveat is that the NPD figures are just looking at bricks-and-mortar retail, not online. So Apple’s own online sales are not accounted for, but nor are most of Dell’s and a number of others.
The future. More important than this statistical oddity about the quarter just past is to compare it to previous quarters and examine the trends. Yes, NPD has done that too.
In the notebook market, sales of Windows PCs are roughly flat compared to the same quarter a year ago. Apple notebooks, on the other hand, are up “50 to 60 percent” according to Stephen Baker, NPD’s VP of industry analysis.
In desktops, Windows PCs are actually down 25 percent, while Mac desktops have risen 45 percent. In the over $US1000 category, Apple’s share of retail sales last quarter was 70 percent.
I’ll say it again: iPod numbers.
Now I’ll muddy the waters. I seriously don’t think that market share is an indicator of Apple’s position in the market. It’s useful in terms of putting numbers to things and tracking trends and so forth, but really it says little about how the market values what Apple is doing.
For example, a lot of those Mac sales — a surprisingly large yet unquantifiable lot — are to Windows switchers who are going to head home and install Windows on their Apple hardware one way or another. Either Boot Camp, or virtualisation via Parallels or VMWare. Some of them might install Linux or some other operating system.
Once the Mac leaves the retailer, there’s no really reliable way of knowing what operating system it’s running. Microsoft’s figures for sales of Vista are equally rubbery, for much the same reason.
Does a MacBook Pro running OS X Leopard, Windows Vista and Ubuntu count as one machine or three? Does it add one computer to Apple’s market share or a third of a computer? What if Windows only gets used occasionally? How do you calculate what proportion of that sale belongs to Mac market share?
Clearly and obviously you can’t.
The lesson here is that market share numbers should be looked at as what they are: numbers, and nothing more. Apple is clearly doing things the right way for the markets it is choosing to address, and it’s managing to defy the trend the rest of the industry is following downwards. That’s good news for Apple.
What matters to customers is whether or not Apple can maintain its edge in innovation, product quality and customer experience. When you walk into a Mac reseller, you are 100 percent of the market, and Apple should understand that.
If it only convinces you 70 percent to buy a Mac, that’s not enough.
wrote on May 23, 2008 5:59 PM
Good points (although the last 2 paras confused me a bit). I've long held that sales are unreliable in and of themselves. They're just dry statistics. What Microsoft should be sitting up and taking notice of is the 'trend' towards Apple. I myself have gone from - this time last year - a desktop with 2 pcs and a laptop on it, to 1 pc (to play media on mostly - though now that I have an iPhone the pc isn't being turned on much anymore), an iMac and a Macbook Pro - one for work, the other personal. And I haven't felt the pull to go back to pc at all. In fact, every time I turn the wretched thing on it does something to pip me off and I end up swearing at it. My Apple experience is completely different. By the end of an 18 hour session it's a wrench to drag myself away to catch a few hours sleep....I love the things so much.
America Online and Netscape once forged an unlikely alliance against Microsoft. Unfortunately their choice of pet names let them down, and the rest is history.
Matthew JC. Powell | Jan 2, 2008
Microsoft has had a change of heart about the non-disclosure period for beta-testers of its Office 2008 for Mac. So it's time to spill some beans.
Matthew JC. Powell | Jan 4, 2008
The timing of the announcement is a curious tactic for Apple. Announcing a refresh of a major product line six days out from theMacworld Expo is a little weird; I can't think why Steve Jobs wouldn'thave wanted to pull a big blue sheet off a Mac Pro (the Xserve marketis pretty specialised when you come to it) and startle the world withit. Then again, perhaps he's got something even snazzier in mind; aFlash-based MacBook Pro that costs $300, reads your mind, does yourironing and has a Time Machine that works with any wireless networkconnection.
Alex Kidman | Jan 10, 2008
The world has been rocked this week with the news that Apple has added Andrea Jung to its board of directors. That's right, that Andrea Jung, the CEO of Avon. That's right, that Avon, the door-to-door cosmetics company. Clearly this indicates a radical new direction in Apple's retail strategy: as well as mass-market retailers, specialised independent resellers, company-owned stores and of course online, Apple is now going to recruit an army of enthusiastic salespeople hoofing it from house to house with sample cases.
Matthew JC. Powell | Jan 11, 2008