News, Reviews and more from Australia's Macintosh Authority
ADVERTISEMENT
They say the iPhone 3GS is hot. Hot as in sexy. Hot as in selling like cakes that are hot. Hot as in “scorch the skin off your face Raiders of the Ark-style.”
Well, two out of three ain’t bad.
But while some would have you believe that Apple has admitted its new flagship device contains its own internal furnace, the truth is there’s nothing new under the devastating heat rays of the sun. Several reports pointed to a Apple tech support document about keeping the iPhone 3G and 3GS “within acceptable operating temperatures” and concluded triumphantly that Apple was aware its devices could be used as tanning beds.
But this document isn’t new—in fact, our own Aayush Arya wrote about it back in May, in regards to dealing with the iPhone in the scorching heat of New Delhi. Apple has merely updated the tech note to cover the 3GS as well. Overheating on the iPhone goes back even farther than that, too: I ran into heat issues and decreased battery life back on my original iPhone in 2007.
Heat is the enemy—it’s one of the most rudimentary facts of technology. All that work your computer, your phone, even your iPod is doing, it all generates heat. Some versions of the Power Mac G5 famously ran so hot they needed their own liquid-cooling system. Faster processors tend to give off more heat than slower processors, so given that the 3GS has, by all accounts, a chip that’s 50 percent speedier than its predecessor—but contained in roughly the same space—it’s no surprise it’s going to get a little toastier.
Apple's own advice mostly covers extreme situations like leaving your phone unattended in a hot car, but come on: leaving anything unattended in a hot car is generally a bad idea—ice cream, for example. If you’re really concerned, check out our tips for keeping your iPhone chilled out, which—if you'll pardon the expression—boil down to these key factors:
In any case, Apple’s tech note says that it’s designed the iPhone 3G and 3GS to comply with safety standards, and that the heat warning is to prevent any damage to the internal components. But it doesn’t mean that the iPhone is about to go thermonuclear in your hand.
"Don't forget to get there very, very early", was the advice given to me by practically everyone prior to this morning's Macworld Conference Keynote. "Things get pretty hairy", they claimed -- and they weren't referencing Australian Macworld's fine editor. So at 5am, having been woken by the loud gentleman speaking German VERY LOUDLY, I prepared towander down the chilly streets of San Francisco and wait. And wait, and wait, and wait. Annoyance doesn't quite cover my mood when another Australian journalist makes an appearance two hours later, right behind me.
Alex Kidman | Jan 17, 2008
Former Apple CEO Gilbert Amelio once famously remarked that "I thought I was leading a company; I didn't realise I was leading a cult". If he thought that job was difficult, imagine what it must be like for Steve Jobs. Where Amelio was leader of the cult, Jobs is the object of its worship. Think of it as the difference between being the Pope and being the Messiah — I know which I'd take. Name another CEO, company founder or Chairman who is expected — indeed, required — to change the world on at minimum an annual basis. Michael Dell? Bill Gates? Steve Ballmer? Rupert Murdoch? Robert Iger? Samuel Palmisano? Does anyone even know who he is? All of these people have great responsibilities and a duty to shareholders to drive their companies. Jobs's burden is different. He is expected somehow to be a few steps ahead of the world, living in the no-too-distant future, bringing tomorrow to us today. Which is not to suggest he is the only person in the computer industry expected to innovate. Google, Amazon, eBay ... any number of companies innovate and do so successfully, What's different for Apple and its CEO is the expectation that it can happen on demand. If anyone but Apple had released a product as successful and groundbreaking as the iPhone last year they'd still be dining out on it. Apple is already copping criticism for not having a 3G version out yet. Compare it to, for instance, Paul McCartney. Some decades ago McCartney wrote some pretty darned good music. Now he's in his 60s and puts out the occasional listenable bit of work. It's not amazing, but it's pretty good and leaves most contemporary "music" for dead. But because it isn't as good as the Beatles it may as well be rubbish. No-one else has to be compared with the Beatles.
Matthew JC. Powell | Feb 13, 2008
One of the challenges Mac users face is trying to sync their mobile devices with their Mac. In a recent forum post, I asked readers for some input to an upcoming column on smartphones. Due to the space constraints of the print version of Australian Macworld I won't be able to cover sync solutions in that feature so I thought I'd pull them together in this post. I'll take a browse through the world of sync solutions for the Mac and cover Mobile Phones, Windows Mobile, Palm, BlackBerry and the rest.
Anthony Caruana | Feb 24, 2008
Apple co-founder Steve Wozniak, speaking in Sydney this morning, said the MacBook Air won’t be a hit (even though he likes it), AppleTV shows the future for digital entertainment (but really frustrates him anyway), and the 2G iPhone was a disappointment to him because of its sluggish internet speed.
Dan Warne | Mar 3, 2008
As I type these words, I am waiting for Apple's Developer Connection web site to ease up sufficiently for me to download the long-awaited Software Developer Kit for the iPhone (and iPod touch, just by the by). In a way, I hate developer-oriented announcements — "here's a really cool thing we're working on, and it's available now, and hoi polloi can have it in about six months". Actually, it's the six months I hate.