iPhone share slump spurs calls for low-price model

Gregg Keizer
29 July, 2013
View more articles fromthe author
AAA
Blogs

Analysts are arguing over the significance of Apple’s falling market share, reflecting the uncertainties the Cupertino, California company faces in a transition to lower profits.

“The current iPhone portfolio is under-performing and Apple is at risk of being trapped in a pincer movement between rival 3in Android models at the low end and 5in Android models at the high end,” contends Neil Mawston, executive director at UK-based research firm Strategy Analytics, in an email.

Mawston pointed to a drop in Apple’s share of the global smartphone market for the second quarter; Strategy Analytics estimated it fell from 16.6 percent in the second quarter of 2012 to 13.6 percent this year, the lowest in three years.

Samsung, meanwhile, boosted its share from 31.1 percent to 33.1 percent in the last 12 months, while other smartphone OEMs, including LG, ZTE and Huawei, also gained share, according to Strategy Analytics’ data.

Late last week, US researcher IDC plotted a similar decline in Apple’s smartphone share, from 16.6 percent a year ago to 13.1 percent in the second quarter of 2013.

But Ramon Llamas of IDC doesn’t agree with Mawston that the share slump forecasts Apple’s doom. “The sky is not falling,” says Llamas. “We expected this [because] this is the usual seasonality you see in iPhone sales. There was going to be a dip in market share.”

Llamas refers to the typical decline in iPhone sales as the newest model ages and a replacement approaches.

Apple’s share will bounce back in the fourth quarter, Llamas maintains, assuming Apple reprises last year’s timetable and launches a new iPhone in late September.

Even so, the declining market share numbers are important. If market share impacts Apple’s iOS ecosystem, as the analysts maintain, then Apple must react to keep what it has or have a shot at growing its share in the battle against Android.

“Market share isn’t everything,” says Kevin Restivo, also of IDC and, like Llamas, part of the team there that tracks smartphone shipments. “The number one goal of any publicly-owned company is to generate profit. That said, for the long-term, market share does matter. It’s a question of reach. The more people who have iPhones, the greater Apple’s ability to sell software, unique online services and other incremental offerings.”

While that revenue may have been incidental in the past, it’s becoming more important as the smartphone industry steps away from the initial ‘land grab’ of users and – as saturation approaches in developed markets like the US and Western Europe – shifts to a software and services model, says Restivo.

Apple has hinted at the transition to software and services in its earnings statements this year, breaking out those revenues for the first time. In the second quarter, for example, the category Apple labels as ‘iTunes/Software/Services’ booked US$4 billion in revenue, 11 percent of the company’s total and 25 percent more than the same period the year before. No other reporting segment came close to that year-over-year gain.

But market share is linked to more than software and service revenues.

The iPhone has been successful, most agree, because of the ‘virtuous cycle’ of sales that lead to developers committing to the platform that leads to more apps that leads to more iPhone sales. A shrinking market share means an end to that cycle or, at the least, a departure of developers.

Llamas disagrees. “The installed base [of the iPhone] is huge and the loyalty rate by customers is still pretty high,” he counters, suggesting that gloomy speculation is unwarranted.

Still, analysts are convinced – though, clearly, not unanimously – that Apple’s shrinking share has motivated it to design and sell a lower-priced iPhone and discard the years-long strategy of filling those price points with older models.

“That’s just not a good enough strategy,” argues Restivo. “Apple is known for its latest and greatest products and, even in pre-paid and emerging markets, that customer base still needs to feel that they have a new, shiny object. If it’s yesterday’s news, there’s not as great a sales potential.”

With a lower-priced phone in its portfolio – more importantly, a new phone in that range, not the ‘yesterday’s news’ of the iPhone 4 or iPhone 4S – Apple can take advantage of the sales opportunities around the world and grow its market share.

Restivo is confident Apple could and would do so.

“There’s a reverence for the brand. Apple is a global, aspirational brand, that’s key,” he says. “And there are opportunities for Apple to compete, even in China, where they’re really only skimming the surface.”

Mawston, of Strategy Analytics, has come to the same conclusion. “Apple’s share of the mobile phone market is struggling to break through the 10 percent ceiling into double figures, and it will only be able to achieve this on a sustainable basis if it adds new iPhone models at lower price-points or with bigger screens in the future,” he says.

“One quarter does not an ecosystem make,” says Restivo. “But I think a lower-priced iPhone is inevitable.”

If Apple makes that decision – according to the rumour mill, it already has, and plans to ship an entry-level iPhone this spring – that means the company has come to terms with lower returns than during the heady days when the iPhone faced little competition. Revenue may continue to pile up, but profit margins have slumped. That trend is likely to continue.

A lower-priced iPhone, and lower margins, will tell the tale about whether Apple adapts or continues doing business as usual.

“As any market matures, it becomes more about volume,” says Restivo, who believes that Apple clearly understands that – no matter how little stock its CEO puts in market share. “I think Apple learned that lesson in the personal computer market.”

by Gregg Keizer, Computerworld

Leave a Comment

Please keep your comments friendly on the topic.

Contact us